Rigorous critique is part of the work.

What to contribute

• Proof-positive cases with strong source metadata.
• Proof-negative cases where a Fractalish reading fails.
• HOLD cases where the morphology may matter but the evidence is not yet strong enough.
• Citations, precedent papers, or domain-specific corrections.
• Tooling and evidence-package feedback.

How to contribute

Use the public repo issues for documentation or tooling critique and the Commons submission lanes for morphology cases. Every case should preserve source, license, limitations, and the reason it belongs in proof-positive, proof-negative, or HOLD.

Contribution guardrails

• Do not force a process reading where the evidence is weak.
• Preserve source and license information.
• Mark drafts as drafts and archives as archives.
• Prefer sequences, timepoints, or outcome linkage where available.
• Proof-negative cases are valuable.

Media rule

If the contribution is a Fractalish-produced video, it should not trap knowledge in linear media. Provide captions, transcript, references, and a companion text page or study-note layer.